From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30069 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 01:46:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 01:46:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CHYDb-0006uy-Ny for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:46:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 17043 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2004 01:46:18 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6919 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 01:46:18 +0000 From: George Shapovalov Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:58:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <416C28E4.4050801@sendmail.com> <13cc2f7804101214361fd7b096@mail.gmail.com> <200410121746.38646.george@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200410121746.38646.george@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410121758.41031.george@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-100000.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Hello X-Archives-Salt: 29e57c43-d8b3-4b52-87f2-3f46ce83a8f6 X-Archives-Hash: 9c032e207c8a15cc7f7d0a4f15dc40ed > 1. look into supporting a local portage tree and sync all local nodes > against it Or, if its an inner LAN segment and you are Ok with security, netmount portage off this central rig. George -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list