From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20359 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 16:44:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 16:44:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CFxrW-0004zX-2w for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 16:44:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 21930 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2004 16:44:56 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4029 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 16:44:56 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:40:24 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: Luke-Jr Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041008174024.18e02618@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200410081626.39210.luke-jr@utopios.org> References: <20041008172930.29a60601@andy.genone.homeip.net> <200410081626.39210.luke-jr@utopios.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_17_40_24_+0100_.LRG3ZZQNalzvDaN" Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] changelog encoding X-Archives-Salt: 20352cc1-551b-49f5-b42c-569a7faaa1ac X-Archives-Hash: cc1104f9e709cc4f90185394b8617e71 --Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_17_40_24_+0100_.LRG3ZZQNalzvDaN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [ hopefully on the list and able to post to it now, if not please forward ] On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:26:33 +0000 Luke-Jr wrote: | > Yup. We *need* to have an official encoding. Reason being, at least | > one developer has a non-(ASCII as in characters 0..126 only) | | ASCII defines 128 characters: 0-127 | Why cut the last off? As I recall, 127 is flaky. Come to think of it, so is 0-31ish as well. So maybe I should've said [a-zA-Z0-9\-_,.<>?/\\;:'@#~\]{}\+="$%^&* ] or something... Basically, anything even the slightest bit flaky, plus newlines, is prone to explode. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_17_40_24_+0100_.LRG3ZZQNalzvDaN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBZsMA96zL6DUtXhERAnlHAJ9C4VJh09io+njBciliGTnPXidTyACfTdiY 5F00tOLQDrJCAdVwaC1El/0= =79ec -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_17_40_24_+0100_.LRG3ZZQNalzvDaN--