From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1089 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 18:08:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 18:08:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C80gg-0007Ll-4g for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:08:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 25080 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2004 18:08:52 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 23884 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 18:08:51 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:08:37 +0200 From: Sven Vermeulen To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040916180837.GA23524@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage .51 features X-Archives-Salt: 3689eeac-a4ec-4f5a-bfe4-96176f39fd68 X-Archives-Hash: f5f1e69cf71a4891c6aa57e7ec05989b --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all The release of Portage 2.0.51 could be a major news item. I'm therefore trying to write a big article for gentoo.org which lists the major changes and new features of .51. A draft (still incomplete but I'm off for the night now) is available at http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/portage.html, the summary itself (not visible on that page) reads: """ The Gentoo Portage team is proud to present Portage version 2.0.51 to the world! Changes include improved support for cascading profiles, dynamic= =20 handling of virtuals, rebuilding on USE-flag changes, gpg verification an= d=20 more. """ I would really appreciate if you can take a look and tell me what else needs to be in it, what can be removed, what should be altered, etc. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen --=20 ^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good. (oo) Sven Vermeulen (__) http://www.gentoo.org Documentation & PR --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBSdalXfqz7M26L9sRAgIVAJ9orUjoDfRC6llcCfg+Tl/AMZNT+QCfXqLx rKghax9P3ctk+7vybZ9KhW8= =cLBl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--