From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6819 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2004 11:57:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Aug 2004 11:57:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BwJdS-0001QZ-3P for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 11:57:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 8279 invoked by uid 89); 15 Aug 2004 11:57:12 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27614 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2004 11:57:12 +0000 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82 References: <20040815055913.GA4107@marcet.info> In-Reply-To: <20040815055913.GA4107@marcet.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 21:00:15 +0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408152100.15716.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage dependencies hell and PATCH to solve it X-Archives-Salt: 3a8c5eda-35b0-4284-b90f-d17848ac0c7c X-Archives-Hash: a27002340a65a85c8a33ac7cff8c8e48 Apologies if this was received already On Sunday 15 August 2004 14:59, Javier Marcet wrote: > From pre11 on I often get errors which always look like (this is with > the last one released, pre17): > > # emerge mozilla -p > > > Invalid package name: moznomail > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > Calculating dependencies > !!! Problem in net-www/mozilla dependencies. > !!! 73 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 The _pre11 patch you provided will cause lots of problems with regards to virtuals. For example, if the default virtual/x11 is xfree and the user tries to emerge xorg-x11, portage will try to install both xfree and xorg-x11 without those lines. The _pre17 patch I'm not to sure about, but it is definately unrelated to the problem you are having - even if enabling the code does appear to fix it. Anyway, it is fixed now and will be in portage-2.0.51_pre18. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list