From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12560 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 20:07:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 20:07:56 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BflN5-0005qT-S9 for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:07:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 21530 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2004 20:07:54 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 723 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 20:07:53 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:07:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406291415.18659.george@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_Y2x4AWiJ4Zx1sL+"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406302207.52557.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: portage-ng roadmap? X-Archives-Salt: 56ebbc4c-ef5a-4f85-a6f6-a23251c0bc7a X-Archives-Hash: 9ae607544edd5726100004aa37884b71 --Boundary-02=_Y2x4AWiJ4Zx1sL+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 30 June 2004 11:03, Adrian Gschwend wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:15:18 -0700, George Shapovalov wrote: > >Well, what's going on is not that its "legally dead". It got its start a= nd > > we threw a bunch of comments on the "design". However there does not se= em > > to be much push behind it at the moment. I suspect there may be only one > > dev working on it (pvdabeel?), if at all. However there is clearly an > > effort to clean-up and enhance the [oroginal] portage under way. > > ok after all I care less about a portage-ng but about something I can use > on non-Linux platforms :-) Is pvdabeel also reading this list? I don't know. Currently I'm working on my own effort on a portage rewrite. = It=20 should follow most of the ideas that have been floating around for ng, but = I=20 cannot give any time on delivery of a useable system. The only thing that I= =20 have really working well now is searching (emerge -s) which is a lot faster= =2E=20 =46urther I've developed an ebuild parser in c++ which still has issues. If= =20 there is a lot of interest I might put it in gentoo cvs or release a tarbal= =2E=20 However as I'm going away in 8 days I think that will happen only in a mont= h. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_Y2x4AWiJ4Zx1sL+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA4x2YbKx5DBjWFdsRAvs4AKDlErwgTKJ5WWmrvRXKWPVnBdPTSgCfbuDT NEAVixnf4Ee30UX+Fymtiqk= =d05v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_Y2x4AWiJ4Zx1sL+--