Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: portage-ng roadmap?

[George Shapovalov <george@gentoo.org>]

Well, what's going on is not that its "legally dead". It got its start and we 
threw a bunch of comments on the "design". However there does not seem to be 
much push behind it at the moment. I suspect there may be only one dev 
working on it (pvdabeel?), if at all. However there is clearly an effort to 
clean-up and enhance the [oroginal] portage under way.

So, if there is enough interest I guess portage-ng may be "restarted", but it 
will take a lot of *sustained* interest to do so.
(And no, I am not the dev working on it nor did I do much work on it :), I 
just followed the progress for some time).

George

On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:44, Hasan Khalil wrote:
> There are, absolutely, people working on portage for alternative
> platforms. I am one of four developers in training, shooting to work on
> gentoo-macos. pvdabeel is the gentoo-macos god currently, so he can fill
> you in with all the details.
>
> I'm wondering the same, actually (regarding all the portage limitations
> listed on the portage-ng page). What's going on, then?



--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list