From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22494 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 21:46:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 21:46:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bf3x0-0004Po-43 for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:46:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 13353 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jun 2004 21:46:04 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4357 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 21:46:04 +0000 From: Roman Gaufman Reply-To: hackeron@dsl.pipex.com To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:55:43 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628160820.17a07020@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628160820.17a07020@sven.genone.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406282255.43007.hackeron@dsl.pipex.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng roadmap? X-Archives-Salt: e15634fb-89eb-4e08-b892-ce2784328467 X-Archives-Hash: 330de4e9bd7df056d427f5ac1c57b143 On Monday 28 June 2004 14:08, Marius Mauch wrote: > On 06/28/04 Adrian Gschwend wrote: > > Unfortunately I couldn't find much about it, so I decided to ask here > > about the status. How is portage-ng getting along? Is there a roadmap > > somewhere? What needs to be done? > > It's not getting along at all, we're concentrating our efforts on the > current portage. Right now I consider portage-ng a dead project. > > Marius Nice to hear actually. I was more than a little skeptical about a rewrite of portage in a lower level language. Wont make portage any faster because of it using files rather than a database. And feature wise, python is flexible to add any of the features mentioned. -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list