From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] /etc/make.profile/use.defaults
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 02:28:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405130228.26388.jstubbs@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40A25357.2060707@skylineaero.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 May 2004 01:39, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 May 2004 01:03, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> >>>On 12 May 2004, at 17:44, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> >>>>But they are only 'scheduled for installation' if the USE flag is
> >>>>activated. The '--emptytree' flag gets emerge in some weird 'chicken
> >>>>and egg' situation. With '--emptytree' set, emerge should assume
> >>>>nothing is installed. If nothing is installed, then tcl and tk aren't
> >>>>installed and the 'tcltk' USE flag shouldn't be auto-activated.
> >>>
> >>>true, unless of course tcl and tk are in the world file, or some other
> >>>installed package depends on both, and therefore causes the tcltk use
> >>>flag to be triggered.
> >>>but it should certainly not auto-enable the USE flag (if it isn't
> >>>enabled specifically) because the current system has it enabled.
> >>>--emptytree should assume nothing is installed
> >
> > This one, I'm undecided on. Strictly, --emptytree should assume nothing
> > is installed. In practice though, many users use it to reinstall
> > everything. If --emptytree does actually assume nothing is installed,
> > users could find themselves with blocked packages overwriting each other
> > and wonderful things like that.
> >
> > Two options I see are:
> > a) Keep current behaviour
> > b) Make --emptytree a --pretend only option and create a new --reinstall.
>
> I think it is more of a consistency bug than a function bug. I don't
> believe it causes any problems in practice, and I only stumbled across is
> because of the project I'm working on. I don't think it actually affects
> anyone.
But if the current behaviour was changed, there would be many that notice.
Jump into #gentoo or post on gentoo-user@g.o and ask how to reinstall
everything. You'll get many answers of emerge -e world and a few saying that
it's not enough and that you'll have to emerge $(qpkg -I).
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQKJeuVoikN4/5jfsAQLr9wP/UFqMXFz3bfvmHL/l4EDJ3wgqBl45Y7ps
Q3GxzZYWT67rCD2fCHkFE+qUAY9ZZf2TsbTWp6KUI9MFI7ebAnfWb1KsJJ4cRz/v
Bh1inr/lhsLS/Vq8C3Wkf8zIHh652q22HygI/neIOGhi6KhzdZpldYwl7Ok26Zf2
0BKmrak0VjA=
=fMF3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-12 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-12 3:02 [gentoo-portage-dev] building dependency tree Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 5:14 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-05-12 6:42 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 7:59 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-05-12 14:43 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 15:02 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-05-12 15:14 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] /etc/make.profile/use.defaults (was: building dependency tree) Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 15:19 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] /etc/make.profile/use.defaults Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 15:43 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-05-12 15:44 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 16:03 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-05-12 16:08 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 16:33 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-12 16:39 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-12 17:28 ` Jason Stubbs [this message]
2004-05-12 16:25 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] building dependency tree Jason Stubbs
2004-05-15 4:12 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-15 6:14 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-15 6:50 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-15 7:06 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-15 15:31 ` Andrew Gaffney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405130228.26388.jstubbs@gentoo.org \
--to=jstubbs@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox