Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla "Feature" Bugs

[Jason Stubbs <jasonstubbs@gawab.com>]

On Thursday 08 January 2004 01:28, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On 01/07/04  Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just been going through some of the unresolved bugs and have
> > found(especially in the earlier bug #s) that there are many feature
> > requests that are unresolved. I'm thinking it would be a good idea to
> > create a "master" bug for portage-ng and then make it depend on all of
> > these unresolved feature requests. Pros? It would make it easy to
> > confirm that there's nothing missing from the reqspec and also make it
> > easy to close many (hundreds?) of bugs on portage-ng's completion.
> > Cons? Massive amount of deps from a single bug. Thoughts?
>
> Actually there already is a bug for that, check for "portage 3".
> Although it is not really used lately.

Bug #2765 entitled "Portage 3 TODO"? The first comment actually implies that 
it's a Portage 2 TODO, but anyway...

Do you think it's worth reviving this bug? If given the okay, I'll start going 
through outstanding bugs and adding deps to anything that is a feature 
request.

--
Regards,
Jason Stubbs

--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list