From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17107 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2004 15:17:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Jan 2004 15:17:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AdA0V-0008OK-5j for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:17:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 9054 invoked by uid 50004); 4 Jan 2004 15:17:34 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30741 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2004 15:17:34 +0000 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:17:27 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040104161727.7b8e8e2e.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20040104125034.GD10062@phaenix.haell.com> References: <1073027790.3678.24.camel@big_squirt.dol-sen.ca> <1073028705.11194.66.camel@Star.BerthoudWireless.net> <20040102102315.GA28754@phaenix.haell.com> <20040104125034.GD10062@phaenix.haell.com> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: H@&[wkk?l:Zx:8i_5bViK&{Vz{c{~r),^&:v/r#+X5dmfA6qCl)~'Ul{"&06Q1[05.%v&c>je5R{=xLnx^=~lN~rO0xuR~~NY)CX\"Nc4$9CBPwDl-.pYuVeGdir86L@\:j?7@%Ej2?Wi-Y0=1]T14ce0w79Bckk[*ti{;iA"{;I}&E~.msRBsBS)N!CS4Gd|_UR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__4_Jan_2004_16_17_28_+0100_OvTXoVDR7cOjP0LO" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] kernel drivers vs. portage X-Archives-Salt: 17808634-2c3f-4641-95f6-9095f01b2339 X-Archives-Hash: 8fe369f6b99f328254c5647fef88a0e9 --Signature=_Sun__4_Jan_2004_16_17_28_+0100_OvTXoVDR7cOjP0LO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/04/04 Drake Wyrm wrote: > What? No opinions, or everybody thinks I'm too much of an idiot to > bother answering? I think Daniel fixed that already by using the 'don't unmerge' feature of CONFIG_PROTECT for /lib/modules. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Signature=_Sun__4_Jan_2004_16_17_28_+0100_OvTXoVDR7cOjP0LO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/+C6LWzrL1pM7SNcRAlvMAJ9UMwd8Oyzi758EJNqkRG1MhC5uVACePuek HGTmGJn6q+oau+d7LGHfZkg= =xouo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__4_Jan_2004_16_17_28_+0100_OvTXoVDR7cOjP0LO--