* [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
@ 2015-04-20 19:45 Bertrand Jaquin
2015-04-20 19:46 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 2/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more verbose when removing INSTALL_MASK glob Bertrand Jaquin
2015-04-20 23:39 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Zac Medico
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bertrand Jaquin @ 2015-04-20 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev; +Cc: Bertrand Jacquin
From: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh>
When FEATURES="nodoc noinfo noman" is used, you will get the following
output for every packages, even virtual that contain no file:
# FEATURES="nodoc noinfo noman" emerge -va1t virtual/cron
..
>>> Installing (1 of 1) virtual/cron-0::gentoo
* Removing /usr/share/man
* Removing /usr/share/info
* Removing /usr/share/doc
* checking 0 files for package collisions
>>> Merging virtual/cron-0 to /
The following patch makes the output as:
# FEATURES="nodoc noinfo noman" emerge -va1t virtual/cron
..
>>> Installing (1 of 1) virtual/cron-0::gentoo
* checking 0 files for package collisions
>>> Merging virtual/cron-0 to /
Signed-off-by: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh>
---
bin/misc-functions.sh | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/misc-functions.sh b/bin/misc-functions.sh
index e08c228..36a3bb8 100755
--- a/bin/misc-functions.sh
+++ b/bin/misc-functions.sh
@@ -267,9 +267,12 @@ install_mask() {
local no_inst
for no_inst in ${install_mask}; do
set +o noglob
- __quiet_mode || einfo "Removing ${no_inst}"
+
# normal stuff
- rm -Rf "${root}"/${no_inst} >&/dev/null
+ if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} ]] ; then
+ __quiet_mode || einfo "Removing ${no_inst}"
+ rm -Rf "${root}"/${no_inst} >&/dev/null
+ fi
# we also need to handle globs (*.a, *.h, etc)
find "${root}" \( -path "${no_inst}" -or -name "${no_inst}" \) \
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 2/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more verbose when removing INSTALL_MASK glob
2015-04-20 19:45 [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Bertrand Jaquin
@ 2015-04-20 19:46 ` Bertrand Jaquin
2015-04-20 23:39 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Zac Medico
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bertrand Jaquin @ 2015-04-20 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev; +Cc: Bertrand Jacquin
From: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh>
When glob are defined in INSTALL_MASK, no output is given on what file
has been deleted.
The following patch provide more information to user about what is
actually removed.
Example:
# INSTALL_MASK='*.h' emerge -va1t x11-proto/xproto
..
>>> Installing (1 of 2) x11-proto/xproto-7.0.27::gentoo
* Removing /usr/include/X11/DECkeysym.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/HPkeysym.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Sunkeysym.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/X.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/XF86keysym.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/XWDFile.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xalloca.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xarch.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xatom.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xdefs.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xfuncproto.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xfuncs.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xos.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xos_r.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xosdefs.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xpoll.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xproto.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xprotostr.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xthreads.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xw32defs.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xwindows.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/Xwinsock.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/ap_keysym.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/keysym.h
* Removing /usr/include/X11/keysymdef.h
* checking 1 files for package collisions
>>> Merging x11-proto/xproto-7.0.27 to /
Signed-off-by: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh>
---
bin/misc-functions.sh | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bin/misc-functions.sh b/bin/misc-functions.sh
index 36a3bb8..68c0c76 100755
--- a/bin/misc-functions.sh
+++ b/bin/misc-functions.sh
@@ -276,7 +276,13 @@ install_mask() {
# we also need to handle globs (*.a, *.h, etc)
find "${root}" \( -path "${no_inst}" -or -name "${no_inst}" \) \
- -exec rm -fR {} \; >/dev/null 2>&1
+ -print0 2> /dev/null \
+ | LC_ALL=C sort -z \
+ | while read -r -d ''; do
+ __quiet_mode || einfo "Removing /${REPLY#${root}}"
+ rm -Rf "${REPLY}" >&/dev/null
+ done
+
done
# set everything back the way we found it
set +o noglob
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-20 19:45 [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Bertrand Jaquin
2015-04-20 19:46 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 2/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more verbose when removing INSTALL_MASK glob Bertrand Jaquin
@ 2015-04-20 23:39 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 0:31 ` Bertrand Jacquin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-20 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev; +Cc: Bertrand Jacquin
These are in the master branch now:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
On 04/20/2015 12:45 PM, Bertrand Jaquin wrote:
>
> # normal stuff
> - rm -Rf "${root}"/${no_inst} >&/dev/null
> + if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} ]] ; then
> + __quiet_mode || einfo "Removing ${no_inst}"
> + rm -Rf "${root}"/${no_inst} >&/dev/null
> + fi
I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
with shell globs:
if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
"${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-20 23:39 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Zac Medico
@ 2015-04-21 0:31 ` Bertrand Jacquin
2015-04-21 0:37 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bertrand Jacquin @ 2015-04-21 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev; +Cc: Zac Medico
On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
> These are in the master branch now:
>
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
Thanks for that :)
> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
> with shell globs:
>
> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
Cheers,
--
Bertrand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 0:31 ` Bertrand Jacquin
@ 2015-04-21 0:37 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 9:48 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
2015-04-22 23:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Bertrand Jacquin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-21 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
>> These are in the master branch now:
>>
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
>>
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
>>
>
> Thanks for that :)
>
>> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
>> with shell globs:
>>
>> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
>> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
>
> I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
>
> Cheers,
>
Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 0:37 ` Zac Medico
@ 2015-04-21 9:48 ` Duncan
2015-04-21 11:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-04-21 17:27 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-22 23:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Bertrand Jacquin
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2015-04-21 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
Zac Medico posted on Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:37:15 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> These are in the master branch now:
>>>
>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?
id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
>>>
>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?
id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for that :)
>>
>>> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
>>> with shell globs:
>>>
>>> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
>>> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
>>
>> I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>
> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if
they'd have been affected.
The two install-masks with globs I use here are:
*.la
(Unmasked on libtool itself, since it has a *.la file that other
package's .configure scripts test for.)
/etc/cron.*/
(I use systemd's timers in place of cron and thus crontablets.)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 9:48 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
@ 2015-04-21 11:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-04-21 17:28 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 17:27 ` Zac Medico
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2015-04-21 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/21/2015 05:48 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
>> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
>> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
>
> I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if
> they'd have been affected.
>
The docs for INSTALL_MASK (man 5 make.conf) don't mention that globs
will work. It's expecting a "space delimited list of file names." Does
it really take a space-delimited list of globs instead? If so, how does
that reconcile with the fact that * could match spaces?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 9:48 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
2015-04-21 11:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
@ 2015-04-21 17:27 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 17:30 ` Zac Medico
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-21 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/21/2015 02:48 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Zac Medico posted on Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:37:15 -0700 as excerpted:
>
>> On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>> On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>> These are in the master branch now:
>>>>
>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?
> id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
>>>>
>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?
> id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for that :)
>>>
>>>> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
>>>> with shell globs:
>>>>
>>>> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
>>>> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
>>>
>>> I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
>> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
>> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
>
> I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if
> they'd have been affected.
>
> The two install-masks with globs I use here are:
>
> *.la
Since it doesn't have an absolute path, this glob is handled by the
find/rm code which comes just after the shell glob code that I was
talking about.
> (Unmasked on libtool itself, since it has a *.la file that other
> package's .configure scripts test for.)
>
> /etc/cron.*/
>
> (I use systemd's timers in place of cron and thus crontablets.)
This is absolute, so it is handled by the shell glob code in question.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 11:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
@ 2015-04-21 17:28 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 19:08 ` Michael Orlitzky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-21 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/21/2015 04:21 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 05:48 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
>>> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
>>> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
>>
>> I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if
>> they'd have been affected.
>>
>
> The docs for INSTALL_MASK (man 5 make.conf) don't mention that globs
> will work. It's expecting a "space delimited list of file names." Does
> it really take a space-delimited list of globs instead? If so, how does
> that reconcile with the fact that * could match spaces?
How does it conflict?
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 17:27 ` Zac Medico
@ 2015-04-21 17:30 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-21 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Zac Medico, gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/21/2015 10:27 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 02:48 AM, Duncan wrote:
>> Zac Medico posted on Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:37:15 -0700 as excerpted:
>>
>>> On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>>> On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>>> These are in the master branch now:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?
>> id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?
>> id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for that :)
>>>>
>>>>> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
>>>>> with shell globs:
>>>>>
>>>>> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
>>>>> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
>>>>
>>>> I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
>>> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
>>> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
>>
>> I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if
>> they'd have been affected.
>>
>> The two install-masks with globs I use here are:
>>
>> *.la
>
> Since it doesn't have an absolute path, this glob is handled by the
> find/rm code which comes just after the shell glob code that I was
> talking about.
>
>> (Unmasked on libtool itself, since it has a *.la file that other
>> package's .configure scripts test for.)
>>
>> /etc/cron.*/
>>
>> (I use systemd's timers in place of cron and thus crontablets.)
>
> This is absolute, so it is handled by the shell glob code in question.
>
Oh, I see what you mean now. It's reconciled by a temporary 'set -o
noglob', followed by 'set +o noglob'.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 17:28 ` Zac Medico
@ 2015-04-21 19:08 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-04-21 19:20 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2015-04-21 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/21/2015 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>
>> The docs for INSTALL_MASK (man 5 make.conf) don't mention that globs
>> will work. It's expecting a "space delimited list of file names." Does
>> it really take a space-delimited list of globs instead? If so, how does
>> that reconcile with the fact that * could match spaces?
>
> How does it conflict?
>
I guess it's more of a filenames-with-spaces question. Would this work?
INSTALL_MASK="Boyd\ -\ Convex Optimization.pdf"
If you can escape the spaces, then the space-separated globs aren't
ambiguous. I was thinking of something like this:
$ /bin/ls B*\ Convex*
Boyd - Convex Optimization.pdf
Normally if you stick something like that in a quoted variable, its
spaces can be unescaped:
INSTALL_MASK="B* Convex*"
But now it's two globs instead of one. The whole thing makes sense if
you can leave the space escaped though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 19:08 ` Michael Orlitzky
@ 2015-04-21 19:20 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-21 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/21/2015 12:08 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>
>>> The docs for INSTALL_MASK (man 5 make.conf) don't mention that globs
>>> will work. It's expecting a "space delimited list of file names." Does
>>> it really take a space-delimited list of globs instead? If so, how does
>>> that reconcile with the fact that * could match spaces?
>>
>> How does it conflict?
>>
>
> I guess it's more of a filenames-with-spaces question. Would this work?
>
> INSTALL_MASK="Boyd\ -\ Convex Optimization.pdf"
No, it doesn't seem to work given the current code. For example:
$ INSTALL_MASK="Boyd\ -\ Convex Optimization.pdf"
$ for x in $INSTALL_MASK; do echo "$x" ; done
Boyd\
-\
Convex
Optimization.pdf
> If you can escape the spaces, then the space-separated globs aren't
> ambiguous. I was thinking of something like this:
>
> $ /bin/ls B*\ Convex*
> Boyd - Convex Optimization.pdf
>
> Normally if you stick something like that in a quoted variable, its
> spaces can be unescaped:
>
> INSTALL_MASK="B* Convex*"
>
> But now it's two globs instead of one. The whole thing makes sense if
> you can leave the space escaped though.
I don't think the inventor of INSTALL_MASK thought about these kinds of
cases.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-21 0:37 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 9:48 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
@ 2015-04-22 23:44 ` Bertrand Jacquin
2015-04-23 1:43 ` Zac Medico
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bertrand Jacquin @ 2015-04-22 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev; +Cc: Zac Medico
On 21/04/2015 01:37, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> These are in the master branch now:
>>>
>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
>>>
>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for that :)
>>
>>> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
>>> with shell globs:
>>>
>>> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
>>> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
>>
>> I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>
> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
Sorry Zac, I was speaking about the $(echo ..), what does it bring to
use it here ?
Cheers,
--
Bertrand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
2015-04-22 23:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Bertrand Jacquin
@ 2015-04-23 1:43 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-04-23 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bertrand Jacquin, gentoo-portage-dev
On 04/22/2015 04:44 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> On 21/04/2015 01:37, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>> On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>> These are in the master branch now:
>>>>
>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for that :)
>>>
>>>> I modified the test as follows in order to ensure that it still works
>>>> with shell globs:
>>>>
>>>> if [[ -e "${root}"/${no_inst} || "${root}"/${no_inst} != $(echo
>>>> "${root}"/${no_inst}) ]] ; then
>>>
>>> I do not really understand the use case here, do you have an example ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
>> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
>> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
>
> Sorry Zac, I was speaking about the $(echo ..), what does it bring to
> use it here ?
>
> Cheers,
>
It's a way to check the result of check the result of shell glob
expansion. The rm call that follows will be subject to identical expansion.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-23 1:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-20 19:45 [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Bertrand Jaquin
2015-04-20 19:46 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 2/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more verbose when removing INSTALL_MASK glob Bertrand Jaquin
2015-04-20 23:39 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK Zac Medico
2015-04-21 0:31 ` Bertrand Jacquin
2015-04-21 0:37 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 9:48 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
2015-04-21 11:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-04-21 17:28 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 19:08 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-04-21 19:20 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 17:27 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-21 17:30 ` Zac Medico
2015-04-22 23:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Bertrand Jacquin
2015-04-23 1:43 ` Zac Medico
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox