From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C562138247 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AD69E0A99; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4298E0A88 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (199.Red-2-137-37.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.37.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 513DE33F1B0 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1385064372.9928.6.camel@belkin5> Subject: Zac's status (Was: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHES] Remove --autounmask, rename --autounmask-write to --autounmask) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:06:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <528DD07E.3010603@plaimi.net> References: <528DD07E.3010603@plaimi.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 5aa96efa-cd75-49be-ad9f-692058f93d6d X-Archives-Hash: f5240840c36a0bd725f91a5ff2181a7b El jue, 21-11-2013 a las 10:21 +0100, Alexander Berntsen escribió: > I sent this to zmedico almost two months ago, but it doesn't look like > he's coming back any time soon, so I'm sending it here and ask someone > to review and commit it (a role zmedico has typically played for me, > as well as being my "mentor" and guide and so on and so forth for > Portage hacking). > > [0] > [1] > Does anyone know what did occur to Zac? I expect it's not a major problem or similar :'(