From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:36:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348778161.3603.13.camel@belkin4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5064B567.7050900@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1333 bytes --]
El jue, 27-09-2012 a las 13:21 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 09/27/2012 01:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:06 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> >> On 09/23/2012 03:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> This looks like could be done with:
> >>> # Automerge files comprising only whitespace and/or comments
> >>> # (yes or no)
> >>> replace-wscomments=no
> >>>
> >>> , setting it to "yes" in dispatch-conf.conf
> >>
> >> It seems like that option is only likely to benefit people who have
> >> disabled the default config-protect-if-modified FEATURES setting, and
> >> I'm not sure that it's a good idea to hide "trivial" differences from
> >> these people by default.
> >
> > Would be a way to detect changes like "0" to "1" or "false" -> "true",
> > "yes" -> "no"... ? I think they usually shouldn't be changed :|
>
> I'm not sure what "problem" you're trying to solve. Since enabling
> FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified, I've found the volume of config
> updates to be much more manageable, and the configs that I do have to
> merge manually don't really bother me.
Well, I hit the problem when updating from stable openrc to 0.10.5 and
needing to reedit some config files as, as normal, I had uncommented
some options, modified some defaults... (like keymap, clock settings...)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-27 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-01 10:19 [gentoo-portage-dev] How to prevent dispatch-conf from reverting valid changes Pacho Ramos
2012-08-01 15:33 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
2012-08-01 23:16 ` Zac Medico
2012-08-01 23:14 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Zac Medico
2012-08-02 6:36 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-08-02 19:34 ` Zac Medico
2012-09-12 20:03 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-08-02 22:56 ` Zac Medico
2012-09-12 20:05 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 10:59 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-23 18:06 ` Zac Medico
2012-09-27 20:16 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-09-27 20:21 ` Zac Medico
2012-09-27 20:36 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2012-09-27 20:41 ` Zac Medico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348778161.3603.13.camel@belkin4 \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox