From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Package compression header for binhosts
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:01:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275422465.24611.9.camel@hangover> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100601051608.GD19306@hrair>
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 22:16 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:32:34PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In order to support alternative compression types for binhost
> > packages, I was thinking about adding support for a header field in
> > the Packages index file. For example, a header line like
> > "PACKAGE_EXTENSION: txz" could be used to indicate that clients
> > should download files with txz extensions instead of tbz2
> > extensions. I'm planning to add support for both tgz [1] and txz
> > extensions.
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142579
>
> 1) requires a version header bump
Agreed. But there were some other pending changes for "VERSION: 1"
Any planned changes to the format should be documented on
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263994
> 2) a header alone isn't useful unless it's specifiable per cpv entry;
> thus it must be inheritable
Per CPV entries is going to bloat the format and make me carry around a
more data on a per pkg basis then I'd want to. How about we run with
zac's idea but use tools to convert a full repo over to $EXTENTION
This should keep the portage code fast as well as it checks for invalid
binpkgs all the time. Having to have portage process a ton of ever
growing extentions is just going to be slow.
> 3) PACKAGE_EXTENSION is overly verbose and unclear it's specifying
> the compressor too; it's intention is for compression, state it as
> such (I mention this in light of URI's existance where
> PACKAGE_EXTENSION would only be a hint of compressor)
>
> Re: #1, there is a decent set of optimizations I'm kicking around in
> pkgcore for the next version- a discussion should probably be started
> there.
>
> Offhand, having a compression specific header (a simple enumeration
> of known compressors) and a DEFAULT_URI that is python string
No go bro. The 'Packages' format should be independent of python.
> interpolation assembled (for example,
> DEFAULT_URI="%(host)s/%(category)s/%(pf)s.txz") seems wiser. Via
> doing what I'm suggesting, it would be possible to do binpkg
> repository 'views' w/out having to map each binpkg into the url space
> for it.
>
> ~harring
--
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-01 3:32 [gentoo-portage-dev] Package compression header for binhosts Zac Medico
2010-06-01 5:16 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-01 20:01 ` Ned Ludd [this message]
2010-06-01 21:22 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-01 21:37 ` Zac Medico
2010-06-01 21:52 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-01 23:53 ` Zac Medico
2010-06-02 3:42 ` Brian Harring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275422465.24611.9.camel@hangover \
--to=solar@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox