From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LleaF-0004OJ-6r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:28:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA2A6E03DE; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sauxb.salomon.at (smtp.salomon.at [193.186.16.13]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D77E03DE for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from servex01.wamas.com (servex01.salomon.at [172.28.2.2]) by sauxb.salomon.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n2N7RuCe014432 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:27:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.28.8.14] ([172.28.8.14]) by servex01.wamas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:27:56 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining From: Markus Duft To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1237547503.21615.1.camel@localhost> References: <000001c9a947$8acf66b0$a06e3410$@org> <1237547503.21615.1.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:27:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1237793224.21615.5.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2009 07:27:56.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[E29705E0:01C9AB88] X-Spam-Info: -1.799 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 172.28.2.13 X-Archives-Salt: 4f8cb065-b46a-4fb9-a31c-f0f38dd76e6e X-Archives-Hash: 007d11bc3473e44b230a1f27d62f4b34 On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:11 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:35 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: > > Hey guys :) > > > > Just wanted to stop by and get some opinions on a patch i wrote for the > > prefix branch. > [snip] Hey there. Seemingly nobody has any comments on this..? :) here's a working version of the patch. i realized that the last one worked only "by accident" :) maybe now, some comments (or questions)? Thanks, Cheers, Markus [snip] > > > > Waiting for comments, suggestions, etc. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Cheers, Markus > > > >