On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 15:15, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> implementation goals:

I do not mean any offense by this, but I will continue to
unapologetically reject anything implementation-focused at this point.
Requirements and design goals need to be written in such a way so that
they are not implementation-specific. So, words such as "USEFLAGS,"
"distfiles," "slots" or even "ebuild" should not be used in any of the
requirements, as they have a built-in bias towards a particular
implementation.

Figure out what types of problems you are trying to address in your list
of implementation goals, and distill them to a raw, generic requirement
or design goal. Then I can incorporate them into the design spec.

Regards,

Daniel