* [gentoo-pms] Do we want an EAPI 5?
@ 2011-06-30 10:31 99% Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2011-06-30 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-pms
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
Should we start pushing for a reasonably quick EAPI 5? I'd see it as
having:
* The stuff that was left out of EAPI 3/4, which is to say :=/:*
dependencies, and the IUSE_IMPLICIT stuff (especially since right
now people are breaking the rules and implicitly using 'prefix' when
they shouldn't, and the rules for (+) and (-) are largely useless
without the stricter control).
* Cleaning up some deprecated stuff (see recent bugs).
* A replacement for versionator, since apparently versionator is still
using (a subset of) the ooooold version rules.
I think there was something else too, but I forget what...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-06-30 10:31 99% [gentoo-pms] Do we want an EAPI 5? Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox