* Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND
@ 2011-06-12 9:13 99% ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Zac Medico @ 2011-06-12 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Ulrich Mueller; +Cc: Michał Górny, gentoo-pms, Ciaran McCreesh
On 06/12/2011 01:18 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> True. How about pkg_setup()? Shall we assume RDEPEND are there or
>> rely on @system only?
>
> IIUC, with Portage's breaking of dependency cycles there's no absolute
> guarantee that packages in RDEPEND will be available in pkg_*.
It would be more accurate to say that it's guaranteed except for cases
in which circular dependencies make it impossible to guarantee.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-06-11 7:32 [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND Michał Górny
2011-06-11 11:53 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-06-12 7:52 ` Michał Górny
2011-06-12 8:18 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-06-12 9:13 99% ` Zac Medico
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox