From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNurL-0006UD-Qd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:45:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54EB6E0B6A; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3FAE0B6A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 904461B4015 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F9B2FA4.7000409@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:45:40 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120404 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available) References: <20120415021641.1858ffde@gentoo.org> <4F8A885C.3050508@gentoo.org> <20120418185913.3d2fa68f@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <201204181340.00474.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120418184138.50153e57@googlemail.com> <4F8F05E9.5070103@gentoo.org> <4F8F0929.2010109@googlemail.com> <4F8F18EC.3000707@gentoo.org> <4F8F3513.2060202@googlemail.com> <20120425224433.2fa0f2de@gentoo.org> <4F98EA90.4000403@gentoo.org> <4F9967DE.8000601@gentoo.org> <4F99F941.90705@gentoo.org> <20120427162051.13554e1a@pomiocik.lan> <4F9AD51F.6060303@gentoo.org> <20378.57067.381372.698034@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120427202614.0edd9c24@googlemail.com> <20378.63178.619568.972455@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120427215824.3382e682@pomiocik.lan> <20120427211227.613709a2@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120427211227.613709a2@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5a8427ce-efb1-4fd1-9a6e-b3dcda1c1473 X-Archives-Hash: 018b4e738bafa7867c7bd8c67b9b5a70 On 04/27/2012 01:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include >> anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of >> candidates for EAPI 5? >=20 > Let's continue this on the PMS list. >=20 > * user patches >=20 > * EAPI parsing >=20 > * the things that were left out of 4: >=20 > + slot operator deps >=20 > + profile IUSE >=20 > * No -j1 for src_test >=20 > * Remove deprecated stuff >=20 > * Zero or one REQUIRED_USE operator >=20 > These might be cheap now? >=20 > * New bash version >=20 > * Get a versionator replacement into the PM >=20 * has_version and best_version argument for cross compiling $ROOT See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D401239 --=20 Thanks, Zac