From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Pyia0-0006CG-4U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:31:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34886E0638; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FF5E0638 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.199] (qiv7.kyla.fi [82.130.46.199]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B7B27DE4 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D7C9CD0.2070808@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:30:40 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] License for code snippets included in PMS References: <19808.23846.525966.607245@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <19814.3494.806039.718196@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <19814.3494.806039.718196@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB284771792F0BF5F79847720" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5c11ea67b9c92b1acb33101a8cb0758f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB284771792F0BF5F79847720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/24/2011 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, I wrote: >=20 >> Could we put all code snippets under some unrestrictive license >> please? Like CC0-1.0-Universal? >=20 > "Qui tacet consentire videtur." >=20 > Patch is included below, please review. >=20 > Ulrich >=20 To be on the safe side I think we should get permission from everyone who has worked on the code snippets before applying this patch. Regards, Petteri --------------enigB284771792F0BF5F79847720 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNfJzUAAoJEPeUsk245OzwZ14QAKEE6mcCAagSzI8nC6B5LD95 shI3/Y6yMWxxyxtdzvUJF18A3GKjce/3Cy9sC/YJD1EMcmkZS9HZ9vgC0PANHCJv m7oXgAx/pBf8xoGp4PXBqPkHAqJDaU+mN5ETQiBLJVMNeaTANp0P3/DHwrvNLr3V BZfw+yyi2+Ht0UMJ4goWkPOOOmBy7HHWPQC7fYsaXy9USBqJcnsDiFFs7LA85EsB 0ot6CHaXDByvVWfHWmeOxGAdDhDC97KavtECF7vpV/4KbQqb6JN0VRk9qgjnWMdi tfgcqMBlCVv4qO+PfFsQj5EQkoz+FDd/xPNQBZgpnPwC7+bA3NOfUTeYl0eeCu+T I4YGviDQnVsRFAnUzvLGDeArCthCKYeMxiR/8aKpA357Rkiuo+a+22cusq0w6lS7 f9Xyffd1lrVOTQCKr+qY8OZv4bH7LRKO3OBEDB+GQYybM+UyRWeAxpmeKGWQznqj LHUUfdcOsFzBWEnousltN25B+raZF/VY3ZeKDw8LDGRvDgWyLDIIA14vJ/gVRhSO i+F/hXhMri5fXgev75c9XMWDny30gaTGDtS9i9sCaVCIhOLdnxYr0Ph4GNDytdaC NmCTE9a6/XINgvVthjPZXBXPlqyqWDmaxfv26CrvNTrcRfWmpPllsJ7fOIt3wwf6 dz5DnuB/2Zzno/J2SNVA =4nKx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB284771792F0BF5F79847720--