* [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade @ 2010-04-03 21:11 Petteri Räty 2010-04-03 21:19 ` David Leverton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Petteri Räty @ 2010-04-03 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-pms [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --] http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/ch05.html#package-ebuild-phases Currently PMS has what <2.1.5 does. 21:05 < Betelgeuse> zmedico: We should put a note to devmanual that if you rely on order of things you should use at least that EAPI 21:06 < zmedico> Betelgeuse: EAPI 1 21:06 < zmedico> oh, I mean EAPI 2 21:06 < zmedico> <2.1.5 supported EAPI 1 What is the order that other PMs currently use? If the new order is used by everyone currently maybe we should change the order for EAPIs like 2 and 3. At least should have the current behavior of Portage for EAPI 4 so that if people need it then they should use EAPI 4. I know that Portage shouldn't have changed it so no reason to bring it up. Regards, Petteri [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade 2010-04-03 21:11 [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade Petteri Räty @ 2010-04-03 21:19 ` David Leverton 2010-04-03 21:22 ` Petteri Räty 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: David Leverton @ 2010-04-03 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-pms On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote: > What is the order that other PMs currently use? Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package). I thought the plan was for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade 2010-04-03 21:19 ` David Leverton @ 2010-04-03 21:22 ` Petteri Räty 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Petteri Räty @ 2010-04-03 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-pms [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --] On 04/04/2010 12:19 AM, David Leverton wrote: > On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote: >> What is the order that other PMs currently use? > > Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and > 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package). I thought the plan was > for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably > make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't. > Yeah this seems prudent to me and was actually what we were just talking about on #gentoo-dev. Regards, Petteri [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-03 21:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-04-03 21:11 [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade Petteri Räty 2010-04-03 21:19 ` David Leverton 2010-04-03 21:22 ` Petteri Räty
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox