public inbox for gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
@ 2010-04-03 21:11 Petteri Räty
  2010-04-03 21:19 ` David Leverton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2010-04-03 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-pms

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]

http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/ch05.html#package-ebuild-phases

Currently PMS has what <2.1.5 does.

21:05 < Betelgeuse> zmedico: We should put a note to devmanual that if
you rely on order of things you should use at least that EAPI
21:06 < zmedico> Betelgeuse: EAPI 1
21:06 < zmedico> oh, I mean EAPI 2
21:06 < zmedico> <2.1.5 supported EAPI 1

What is the order that other PMs currently use? If the new order is used
by everyone currently maybe we should change the order for EAPIs like 2
and 3. At least should have the current behavior of Portage for EAPI 4
so that if people need it then they should use EAPI 4. I know that
Portage shouldn't have changed it so no reason to bring it up.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-03 21:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-03 21:11 [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 21:19 ` David Leverton
2010-04-03 21:22   ` Petteri Räty

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox