From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAd9-0005gN-2F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:11:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2E64E0AA6; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F51E0AA6 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.197] (qiv5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A5E1B403C for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB7AF1B.3060203@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 00:11:55 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig54A7CD0AF2F8D4343382D274" X-Archives-Salt: cefdddd2-7573-4603-9576-9f688b0dce2f X-Archives-Hash: dc2cbed8fe959a0786cc9eda62d1540d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig54A7CD0AF2F8D4343382D274 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/ch05.html#package-ebuild-phase= s Currently PMS has what <2.1.5 does. 21:05 < Betelgeuse> zmedico: We should put a note to devmanual that if you rely on order of things you should use at least that EAPI 21:06 < zmedico> Betelgeuse: EAPI 1 21:06 < zmedico> oh, I mean EAPI 2 21:06 < zmedico> <2.1.5 supported EAPI 1 What is the order that other PMs currently use? If the new order is used by everyone currently maybe we should change the order for EAPIs like 2 and 3. At least should have the current behavior of Portage for EAPI 4 so that if people need it then they should use EAPI 4. I know that Portage shouldn't have changed it so no reason to bring it up. Regards, Petteri --------------enig54A7CD0AF2F8D4343382D274 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLt68eAAoJEPeUsk245Ozwz0UQAKZWAJlgR4KKgVKURnvlFCd8 EaF9eea80jUegheQ8vdJq8HrNDYNxYhMbYyzGt1kFoPzmro7faX3VzCXA06ua3ph +ssvl7x2hRq+axkoYwtH/kiOwwgt9yPOwmksT9RmeESF4zFAaqG2Pi+95UPQFTQ9 89hmeinripQsNPCP0AJ9w1YmuYmztDyMD4rPKd4+uPtvd1ZWchuav2ZmW8hOAdLB 81ruVFcdBEOZGoHRJfHwYmmzh5OYzP4UfEEFNQ8l3tNCdDz/gYAeqE1lXH+3+4UD Sx56lQ08uH4PCceDObfadwNIoe3AikxeYCy+H/YmeDrI6rnDRdQZrcTGqTTaqNDT 1+ThSsmpBLV2fjLxoWWYvidSSXI8cuxgez5JLKiGaa6jnATQWfzvQv80lsMatdxm bEzLvN7JwkEeIScqsDEYoy0fPnhkRPzhskjgOJuIjSWYlp7J1h3A4fukGUyMgivv 8gxFNi8irsbDY8DR/FBAoaeodFHXrweH26E/xP+PQqY8MMn4C5pRUL++XEN6u7I2 pYnM7MOIojsnxEHaEps0TsnZgQ3FodRUalTwmX2RqR7nm4Y8efCODKTrQwnXNZkK 72Ao4m8OZOqg4La/RFYu8rzCkoQXzFhPT+WtIz25KfexjvTzVeH2hDSBG7Ok5bav 8hmzbWdN9Np3CInylnRJ =W/u6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig54A7CD0AF2F8D4343382D274--