From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582DE1382C5 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 11:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9813E0985; Tue, 1 May 2018 11:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935DDE0985 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 11:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E00B2335C80; Tue, 1 May 2018 11:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <23272.21606.296243.529557@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 13:49:58 +0200 To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_G=F3rny?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 2/6] best_version: Explicitly specify the output format In-Reply-To: <23272.20633.915380.769616@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20180501112401.7606-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20180501112401.7606-3-mgorny@gentoo.org> <23272.20633.915380.769616@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+pYBpbYwrxAz9zbC"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 153ffd9e-b81a-4d18-bced-14fd96ce4542 X-Archives-Hash: 8e0a6e09dbc43d7b40504cbbadb0e76c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+pYBpbYwrxAz9zbC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>> On Tue, 1 May 2018, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> - matching package is installed, prints the category, package name and version of the highest >> - matching version; otherwise, prints an empty string. The exit code is unspecified. >> + matching package is installed, prints the category, followed by \t{/}, followed by package >> + name, followed by \t{-}, followed by full version of the highest matching version; > Do we really need this? I think that "category, package name and > version" is pretty clear. And if we update the wording, I would suggest "the qualified package name, version, and revision (if any)". This follows the definition of PF in the variables table. The term "qualified package name" is explained in section 3.1.2 and in the glossary. Ulrich --pgp+signed+pYBpbYwrxAz9zbC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJa6FRiAAoJEMMJBoUcYcJzqqgH/1L1FK2jQuG5SObeMcuhXuru cFWOS9N8I2q/wY6JNMVzzButXcrXVyLD01ZdGEPJNFpLTIITI9cKK/slr5kay/uH YhS3Vlt6WWazYD7U/r0XelmgeOtEgGHKDmil1HJUcJ3LfmD2qDKzwi2uuoad5oFJ MVZuT9RYbcwmml2okiJBk+xjHYVZANALL5Rh58BbSd+BYIQBOHEnfH779kfO2msb wgVTxfkjEwAWy5BrrlRMukENjVe5uX2VJqlgwOxwCwNIO3hcIbVcIPS371//5mkU qFXFOPAzeyIotUu08ZS8rH/ZCZ4DCDccs/dtTxDIcxoefSoYsnL8ITnwp8uCx6U= =Ps/j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+pYBpbYwrxAz9zbC--