From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99936138010 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C037321C002; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C502721C002 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q917FdV0016011 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:15:40 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q917FdST015968; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:15:39 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q917FdAx015964; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:15:39 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20585.17179.531266.341712@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:15:39 +0200 To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] EAPI must be at least a single char. In-Reply-To: <5068E2E0.8080803@gentoo.org> References: <1348993716-27744-1-git-send-email-ferringb@gmail.com> <20584.3387.660954.8184@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120930194455.GB2180@localhost> <5068A308.3090303@gentoo.org> <20120930222235.GH2180@localhost> <5068E2E0.8080803@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: fad69b97-40f8-44f1-b567-a4ef2afb9707 X-Archives-Hash: eee8eb29e3fe80e08c5e7eb952e39fa8 >>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Zac Medico wrote: > Still, I'd be in favor of changing the regex to match practically > anything that looks like an EAPI assignment, regardless of the > validity of the EAPI value. I don't believe that this is possible. You'll never be able to match everyting that it valid bash syntax, other than by parsing it with bash itself. Which is what we wanted to avoid, in the first place. (( $'\x45\x41\x50\x49' = 4 + 1 )) Ulrich