From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA9A138010 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B373F21C04F; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284B521C04F for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q8GGE3u7031093 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:14:03 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q8GGE31K007304; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:14:03 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8GGE3ZL007300; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:14:03 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20565.64203.480058.568298@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:14:03 +0200 To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: [PATCH] Allocate __* for package manager internals, blacklist it for ebuilds. In-Reply-To: <20120916072418.GJ28593@localhost> References: <1347327593%2d1144-1-git-send-email-ferringb@gmail.com> <20565.30069.397545.214809@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120916072418.GJ28593@localhost> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: a5bdc768-7a8f-40d5-aafa-316f09fe4aed X-Archives-Hash: 3309923769c381d2d2773cb768223606 >>>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Brian Harring wrote: > I'd frankly rather it in both locations. Ebuild devs are more likely > to read the sections I tagged w/ this info, imo. I doubt that many ebuild devs will consult the PMS to find out about reserved names. The only way to ensure that __* names are not used in ebuilds is to enforce it with repoman. And maybe add a note in the devmanual. Ulrich