From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:15:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20404.53186.682463.406986@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20400.7609.247161.887999@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
>>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2012, David Leverton wrote:
>>> Hm, the condition "If a recognised EAPI has been determined such,
>>> then ..." is important and shouldn't be removed.
>> I took that out because the PM should treat the parsed EAPI as
>> authoritative whether or not it's recognised...
>>> If the result of parsing is an EAPI not known to the package manager,
>>> then the ebuild must not be sourced (but be rejected immediately).
>> ... which is basically what you're saying here, but maybe you want
>> explicit wording saying that the sourcing should be skipped in such a case?
> Updated patch is included below, as discussed on IRC.
Committed.
Ulrich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-06 7:40 [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-06 17:29 ` Robin H. Johnson
2012-04-06 17:32 ` Brian Harring
2012-04-06 17:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-04-06 18:13 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-06 18:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-04-06 18:57 ` David Leverton
2012-04-06 21:25 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-06 21:56 ` David Leverton
2012-04-07 2:44 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-10 10:53 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-10 15:43 ` Zac Medico
2012-04-10 16:30 ` Brian Harring
2012-04-10 16:35 ` Zac Medico
2012-04-10 16:58 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-10 19:23 ` Zac Medico
2012-04-10 19:25 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-04-10 20:13 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-10 20:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-04-10 21:19 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-10 21:41 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-04-10 22:11 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-10 23:20 ` David Leverton
2012-04-11 8:04 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-11 16:31 ` Zac Medico
2012-04-11 18:02 ` David Leverton
2012-04-11 18:22 ` Zac Medico
2012-04-12 11:55 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-04-15 22:30 ` Zac Medico
2012-04-15 23:12 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-05-13 18:23 ` David Leverton
2012-05-13 19:00 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-05-13 19:11 ` [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing David Leverton
2012-05-13 19:35 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-05-13 19:40 ` David Leverton
2012-05-13 20:46 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-05-17 10:15 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2012-05-13 19:12 ` [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 2/2] Require a space before the trailing comment David Leverton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20404.53186.682463.406986@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox