From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SRBYv-0005IQ-Ti for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 00:12:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E975AE06D7; Mon, 7 May 2012 00:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A8EE06D7 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 00:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q470CFmg020639 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:12:15 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q470CE4u016649; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:12:14 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q470CEDh016646; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:12:14 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20391.4958.679176.238500@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 02:12:14 +0200 To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch) In-Reply-To: <20120506214329.5680b646@googlemail.com> References: <20120506214329.5680b646@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 0b781604-b2cb-48b3-a5a2-a599d007bbb0 X-Archives-Hash: b9a559e298d4e59378046d2b8f342a31 | Furthermore, for these EAPIs, if the function is overridden, it | shall be a fatal error if the apply_user_patches command has not | been called at least once by the end of the phase. Wouldn't it make more sense to call apply_user_patches implicitly at the end of the phase, if it hasn't been called before? Otherwise, a call to that function would have to be added to every ebuild that defines src_prepare. Ulrich