From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9285E138010 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E9B121C017; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DC121C005; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-253-194-73.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.194.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C8C033D86C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:58:54 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ferringb@gmail.com, gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Message-ID: <20120926085854.6dd14bae@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/FS+FFqU1/h7W9/y2yaRqSex"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3ecef24b-5fae-4ed0-85e2-cbeb830abb50 X-Archives-Hash: 98b6a6755b10d8faf9bd15e81fb5bf32 --Sig_/FS+FFqU1/h7W9/y2yaRqSex Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700 Brian Harring wrote: > Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm=20 > proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement. >=20 > The live version of the doc is available at=20 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependenc= ies.html=20 One more question -- are we going to keep 'foo,bar?' syntax as a special case applying only to dependency atoms or are we going to extend it to USE flags? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/FS+FFqU1/h7W9/y2yaRqSex Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlBip64ACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0MegQAio32++ueclPrMr+5+8yA5CDd 5EAaoy9aZG36yoCXR6utNpJZryXjJcQbY2YHW164sHZpoYQcupry1XMAQFb2Q7M9 aBjavE3/wDfHHGud6osEt4RZH02XdOIh+OM2UABWR66R8bD3A+Q7Ck0q3zIodNfB xGrqSju9FDfklbSn7aI= =s4ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FS+FFqU1/h7W9/y2yaRqSex--