From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SR56f-0007Ra-Eo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 17:18:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6DF8E0687; Sun, 6 May 2012 17:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C91E0687 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 17:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so3218021wer.40 for ; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=N0PagMwbTBxdX3wCQ9WSZq3/3V8WxO6Zk/MqKhqkRI4=; b=BHrYVBczpTaX0gAx005Wm29IjOPOwllmZKUij2AFuhPbASIAl34gY+lMRID7v9+drx 8hIR5XidMkrLH12CrIoj4J0zjexS6A78dIpZSH7+mxOxV4rdFCqCvL2f/I5HEKiZb4w1 7N3AYYkv0QmRRWlD+vfz8JEaEdskCt7dC4n5O5meg1utzMyXa2LHAfyVhpxJ01btSKWF u6MVCnXJ1QURpHGUF32U5NSPDDIiRzY1gDwiNCWgUYOYfuqaJ2V8kWYYjoLGrQwfwqOQ yjPGDDsQdkELnzdgBCSnls0rkh1CvhQW9nIFiEsHwaJ3fceRZdLaBxuEZkRpHCF5Dq3D K3Qg== Received: by 10.180.100.2 with SMTP id eu2mr20133334wib.1.1336324718906; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id du4sm24056582wib.10.2012.05.06.10.18.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 May 2012 10:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 18:15:55 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? Message-ID: <20120506181555.30135099@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/acoAEEaHPN4cPsz_w_l.Wzz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 562bd6b6-71b6-457e-bb8d-f35c04e98abb X-Archives-Hash: c3441d47ce4967b018fe7e4ab2f3ef91 --Sig_/acoAEEaHPN4cPsz_w_l.Wzz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5, to go with apply_user_patches? If we don't, users will have to either work out the patch command themselves, or hope that ebuilds they want to patch inherit eutils.=20 --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/acoAEEaHPN4cPsz_w_l.Wzz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+msdMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGrFwCeIWLT0CAQ0N30zXJrlSO/4ALE iJAAoNOc05I5e/YW9Mq9IX7cTFtyOntl =UNrY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/acoAEEaHPN4cPsz_w_l.Wzz--