From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOyrF-0007ci-Rh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:14:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 242BAE07B4; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CF7E07B4 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:14:01 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7471ELeN8= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-166-116.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.166.116]) by smtp.strato.de (joses mo43) (RZmta 28.16 AUTH) with ESMTPA id Q02ee7o3ULplkN for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 00:14:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 00:14:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.3.1-gentoo; KDE/4.8.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20120415021641.1858ffde@gentoo.org> <20120427215824.3382e682@pomiocik.lan> <20120427211227.613709a2@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120427211227.613709a2@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart23465996.0sAW9yjZnx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205010014.21031.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e5a7b02e-b89f-4f4b-9176-ee6884de19fe X-Archives-Hash: 0aa9148d070b54ba913debd9279b7351 --nextPart23465996.0sAW9yjZnx Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Freitag 27 April 2012, 22:12:27 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200 >=20 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include > > anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of > > candidates for EAPI 5? >=20 > Let's continue this on the PMS list. >=20 [...] Pretty please,=20 * package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force support, as discusse= d=20 on gentoo-dev (there and on IRC feedback was pretty much positive) http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6c492ae43ad7c70cef6aa8ac34911adf.= xml Thanks,=20 Andreas =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart23465996.0sAW9yjZnx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+fDrwACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWoNcQCcCKUNoEIBadZJv9UbVP9JnAKb RR4AmgOUIpK4BUQlCG6fmU0CC3UCAfkF =umcd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart23465996.0sAW9yjZnx--