On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:50:43 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:20:01 +0200
> Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > * IMPLICIT_IUSE
> > 
> >   Finally allow to write legal ebuilds respecting Prefix wish to not
> >   have to add prefix to IUSE. A solution was proposed and approved
> > by council.
> > 
> >   https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366555
> 
> That one's one of the "things that were left out of EAPI 4".
> IMPLICIT_IUSE isn't something you can do on its own without the rest
> of the original-EAPI-3 USE cleanup.
> 
> 

Is there anything beside the IMPLICIT_IUSE left from the original EAPI
3 proposal which didn't made it into either EAPI 3 or 4 but would be
required?

I don't mind if EAPI 5 is the only EAPI properly handling this case and
declaring it undefined behaviour (in fact the same as the current
situation) for earlier ones.

Ralph