From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SO3Nv-0000zJ-Kp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:52:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6228CE07A4; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC695E07A1; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-253-150-60.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.150.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 248B11B404E; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com, gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available) Message-ID: <20120428105207.135d15be@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120427211227.613709a2@googlemail.com> References: <20120415021641.1858ffde@gentoo.org> <4F8A885C.3050508@gentoo.org> <20120418185913.3d2fa68f@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <201204181340.00474.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120418184138.50153e57@googlemail.com> <4F8F05E9.5070103@gentoo.org> <4F8F0929.2010109@googlemail.com> <4F8F18EC.3000707@gentoo.org> <4F8F3513.2060202@googlemail.com> <20120425224433.2fa0f2de@gentoo.org> <4F98EA90.4000403@gentoo.org> <4F9967DE.8000601@gentoo.org> <4F99F941.90705@gentoo.org> <20120427162051.13554e1a@pomiocik.lan> <4F9AD51F.6060303@gentoo.org> <20378.57067.381372.698034@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120427202614.0edd9c24@googlemail.com> <20378.63178.619568.972455@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120427215824.3382e682@pomiocik.lan> <20120427211227.613709a2@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/pJL4hKWw8tZhVGjLjVOz_xq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 49d3b7a1-b73d-4cb5-a7a4-15cbfe3e9bca X-Archives-Hash: b8b3367990991720adbb83b223870d2a --Sig_/pJL4hKWw8tZhVGjLjVOz_xq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > * Get a versionator replacement into the PM Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular? What does the eclass lack which could be provided by PM? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/pJL4hKWw8tZhVGjLjVOz_xq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk+br7wACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2ivQP9EoA9QdnZWXL9UwDSW6aU0fh7 Ky8qB2QqqoO8+KKBFbfEwRObE6h5qqZDN01eTqtMy3OEbrUYVBFZm4HkmtYxguFd BrO9yAKo9E+4y2G9dmvZUNlme8WxxtQUL5uTQBfM3SJ9qq6DfFER2mllGWKJt2kl JX0Nyl/EzijVdgpq5bw= =JTVF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pJL4hKWw8tZhVGjLjVOz_xq--