From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QYPhV-00075Y-R4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:38:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 994171C02A; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC691C02A for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so3669338wwj.10 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:38:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=hhoH3+6OILlfW75tbY9+2A+Za/IADRl7DloxkcNe46A=; b=YIkNgeXMHv8fwR+kWxHmXEUnYZ32PWudg4vzhH6L1aAxULfzN/vRndZB5JNJZPU3C5 1eOQwGGYCbhFv3laHV6VYM8xgdWk9vM57SqtrOSoExalmudEQO3EdXocfBwLkIJDWVW/ M60P/ENiHWiC+Msz3Q8SBcp+PAzR5+Box0GyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Ler1N/gSCL2QsRYom/FUmn1YJjW4yNCdLGl7RJBJ+pfsnwIEapYp+qKE3YCrRa3XkP FGGpo8aiTkmU7sIxE8GJQWtTE4HfSLileO7pDcMVQgk1PuJhhMVNaw0pA47U9OA/k6p+ +V0sH/ANOCxOcEYLTN4slJwhnBvzlwiTeYerM= Received: by 10.216.229.165 with SMTP id h37mr1248020weq.69.1308519508314; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo4-0-0-cust780.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.215.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm2684879wbh.55.2011.06.19.14.38.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:36:04 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org, Zac Medico , Ulrich Mueller Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND Message-ID: <20110619223604.2d4f7f17@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110619232102.0690d10e@pomiocik.lan> References: <20110611093245.5d9d266c@pomiocik.lan> <20110619232102.0690d10e@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1Gy7iCv.YgWxPSh1FDuC3u5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7c0dcf95858bf28596847ec5e8567a62 --Sig_/1Gy7iCv.YgWxPSh1FDuC3u5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:21:02 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > And the third version. >=20 > I added a note about the possible circular RDEPEND issue. I wanted to > do that through a footnote but wasn't able to get it working so it's > a standard bracket now). I still don't think we should be specifying "RDEPEND is PDEPEND if the package manager feels like it". That's something for the package mangler to provide as a horrible --ignore-dependencies-to-break-cycles option. Also, isn't pkg_setup the same as pkg_preinst, availability-wise? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/1Gy7iCv.YgWxPSh1FDuC3u5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3+a8gACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHeXQCgxd1tmArioaMPep8n7hZVsCVy iR4AniwqGID7W3y3cS4DoaTDQnlOjLtb =ed+6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1Gy7iCv.YgWxPSh1FDuC3u5--