On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:21:02 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> And the third version.
> 
> I added a note about the possible circular RDEPEND issue. I wanted to
> do that through a footnote but wasn't able to get it working so it's
> a standard bracket now).

I still don't think we should be specifying "RDEPEND is PDEPEND if the
package manager feels like it". That's something for the package
mangler to provide as a horrible --ignore-dependencies-to-break-cycles
option.

Also, isn't pkg_setup the same as pkg_preinst, availability-wise?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh