From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PPNSg-0008Ud-8a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:53:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B5DFE06FD; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF56AE06FD for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5697292wwi.10 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:53:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=qruoCtNElTDlQaJ4s4Jayhqawhe0rUDkjWTU12+fS8w=; b=SgkZ0EI0dO+cVrM5jCudIRGSJYJII7fJI/sZWxei0pJgOq5iD4t7CiUOB5GS6axYgu s75kuLAniavriQRGNkk2XKyh8LgeP4qafCUemiCsObbeE8K5clmJPgiLETX96P8ZKRaz zpPYQP3HHpBUeRljfnRCybRU/6etPoVZRSiyg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=nUMbPIYjRc8KDtYiLJy/FEH3EWNuK/051wQh3JZUyVL84LLYMVw8Vu+ODmmJLYsxtO OVQqPm4tJnYQKZWTpuloDxYLCH571B11bqQd7WotdWxQW7RO4Ir/6Yet/LeI+Z2is+hj 8up6aCJW9R9+u6k1p/Iq8Hy33z5TLphvJIksw= Received: by 10.216.185.81 with SMTP id t59mr725529wem.105.1291589612031; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l14sm2053084weq.35.2010.12.05.14.53.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:53:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:53:21 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Variancy? Message-ID: <20101205225321.56af5a84@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <19708.5871.249425.932759@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <19708.2662.412210.696119@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20101205220627.64452d13@snowcone> <19708.3722.816939.875731@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20101205222116.310262cc@snowcone> <19708.5871.249425.932759@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/aLshmFBu1r.+SRHsbmbvu4r"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 35dbe969-fa9f-4a8e-b4e6-b9cd0bddf946 X-Archives-Hash: 73e5b69bef021dc34b30c05c70e3ae53 --Sig_/aLshmFBu1r.+SRHsbmbvu4r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:49:19 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> >> - Calling pkg_pretend. >=20 > > pkg_pretend's sandboxed and isn't supposed to be modifying /, so > > that should be ok. >=20 > Then pkg_pretend should be mentioned as a further exception (unless we > decide that the whole section should be removed): Is there a specific use case for allowing pkg_pretend to be run later on? The general idea's that pkg_pretends will be run one after another before any pkg_setups start. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/aLshmFBu1r.+SRHsbmbvu4r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz8F+UACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEf1QCgl8A3kgPMXWyQIA1P1jt3kEv+ /DIAoN5nZLlhb4NhVmcj5S2ozgUH8mjC =MHk1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/aLshmFBu1r.+SRHsbmbvu4r--