From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OLWqO-00009K-4F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:34:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE261E0C99; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED4E0C99 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so1468776wwb.40 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=RfxOY/YusBa/51RKHz4hyOloK7kSxELkjnIHoQxTQ9U=; b=KdfXLXNOQJ37HmECyvZQT3xqcBMUKGet1dXQLYgHwABwc0lycBEDT1H274b7WuWRUi saly/0hB+Ap0ZRTjCFakSa4Kbvck8fJNowiRsPXp19YxpbHUTxLqugHxPnNo72DE1Y0w Yjt3C0zTt8YGZ/ZqyHDAUzr1FpN/tCMZIr9Eg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=KUOWVclk6/ya+rb1LFgMcXKfmNnBYemAKWmJftEjULMhpwO3MigIIGiBBT5vHPsznU RfG9MzRz4pHMisCVLSOkgMAoPmdLpCZnt5BD0RqX77XyTotfEGRJrJfYejZMySje658o H7N1R4m431PmD6vf1IeNpWhn+tPeeG2tJdv+w= Received: by 10.227.127.131 with SMTP id g3mr3927956wbs.129.1275896034099; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ([92.16.59.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n31sm35682583wba.3.2010.06.07.00.33.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:33:48 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] why is '@' allowed in use flags Message-ID: <20100607083348.0fdd8c4a@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20100607072946.GG6316@hrair> References: <20100607052303.GE6316@hrair> <20100607082647.310ba5da@snowcone> <20100607072946.GG6316@hrair> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/gxmQd/TboZj6Clct.+01hfa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c7d5d0fe-97a6-4e9c-8742-8d67cc4f9f8d X-Archives-Hash: 99c304783709619c3113259e6675e1f2 --Sig_/gxmQd/TboZj6Clct.+01hfa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:29:46 -0700 Brian Harring wrote: > Follow up discussion point; anyone got a character to use for=20 > seperating use_expand groups and their members? I'm well aware '_' > is used right now, but it's use is nonoptimal- the only way to break > down a use_expanded target in IUSE is to know the use_expand > grouppings themselves, which is profile defined... a flaw I've hated > since day one. We've been using : in exheres-0. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/gxmQd/TboZj6Clct.+01hfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwMoN8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGYWACg3qTAUPcF/jCf4R8S9v+c+q9y R5sAn1UZZrf7VKTy3lb9xtNxgmflEC2d =LLST -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gxmQd/TboZj6Clct.+01hfa--