From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAl5-0006No-AE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:19:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1B0FE0ADF; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61451E0ADF for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so213273bwz.26 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=F0Qn0THaZr2ipvNRz2PAz17KMb0if4C8G9rgqlRgw7Y=; b=pMk9lzGz5FpA1h3+9Ak5OKBnp4+yD6v7wws2HIoVIslQB6LxDgt2NpMXBg9nGz3lEj 99qrTasi2+5BgvTDS84GkAdjSJzt0zNhULUEGVmENHVUfaD7cCi0823Ty2ZKv+gGscq1 DdFry8D/f7EocjwFFVt5oQ6j75NphdVVJLJp8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=RA3XzT/AqwhEsyfoofMsX4lEF5sVBitXYD1SSjskRJrQ0PiBNyPfAn7qMZuvkQFRs8 aIU+gnY3TUKcbWloIcEVtF5J4w1WVq2Rm9jJvzplI7eMsuRnAZgvXFXRZ8CBJKVGEKcB BQ9ka9jqlrtyuA6PkEOaR3N6q9rBg4S89koYM= Received: by 10.204.48.197 with SMTP id s5mr4644457bkf.177.1270329596769; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiny-one.home (host86-183-39-28.range86-183.btcentralplus.com [86.183.39.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a11sm90407468bkc.21.2010.04.03.14.19.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 22:19:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4BB7AF1B.3060203@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB7AF1B.3060203@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201004032219.50735.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 949d2d96-a647-4b20-bdc3-d3b872ce2273 X-Archives-Hash: de21b3bb88ba26c251d5c83fc1ae57e0 On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > What is the order that other PMs currently use? Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 a= nd=20 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package). I thought the plan w= as=20 for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably= =20 make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn'= t.