On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:34:37 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> >> No objections. Maybe a footnote in section 2.2 "Defined EAPIs"?
> 
> >  Yes, that would be a good place.  Could you please prepare a new
> > patch?
> 
> Attached. Only change to previous version is addition of a footnote:
> 
> \footnote{Another inofficial EAPI `kdebuild-1' was a series of
>     extensions to EAPI `1' formerly used by the Gentoo KDE project.
>     Some of its features have been included in EAPI `2' or later.}

'Inofficial' isn't really a word, no matter what Google suggests. It
looks weird with 'in' rather than 'un'.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh