From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTjSD-00084o-Ff for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:06:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 200EFE068E for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B34E0A90 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 20:22:53 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOj49PSKqp0+M+l26 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p5793FC76.dip.t-dialin.net [87.147.252.118]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo1) (RZmta 22.6) with ESMTP id e002fcm09ISqCu for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 21:22:53 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 21:22:25 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features Message-ID: <20100109212225.16465192@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <19272.52850.175719.236536@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20100109004201.77cdaa5a@gentoo.org> <20100109000834.6f6ed79a@snowmobile> <19272.15307.279638.864461@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20100109085821.7cf45202@snowmobile> <19272.52850.175719.236536@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/a3uVy=yKsf/ZEsv43UljU.U"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 18b4ba8a-f41e-4646-86a8-84626290343a X-Archives-Hash: ae963ed11e7ddcd31b39b0e477fd2c48 --Sig_/a3uVy=yKsf/ZEsv43UljU.U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ulrich Mueller : > But we may have to revert that eclass for a different reason: > The council has voted (in the same meeting) that an upgrade path for > stable systems must be provided for one year at least. One year ago > bash-3.2_p33 was the latest stable version, therefore we must not yet > rely on any bugfixes in _p48. It may be any patch level that makes python.eclass workable. I only could test the difference between p0 and p48. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/a3uVy=yKsf/ZEsv43UljU.U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktI5ZsACgkQNQqtfCuFneNdMwCglTvDqqIC+VHqV0IhL+u2GlvA h8EAoJaCgo9t3eUxPl+RRXl8EMh+fpYS =9iCk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/a3uVy=yKsf/ZEsv43UljU.U--