From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTdvr-0001Gz-4f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:12:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6DB2E0B32 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 16:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A174E07CE for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:00:25 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOj49PSKqp0+M+l26 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p5793FC76.dip.t-dialin.net [87.147.252.118]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo21) (RZmta 22.6) with ESMTP id 60393dm09BCNl9 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 16:00:24 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 16:00:23 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features Message-ID: <20100109160023.5dcdef17@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20100109085821.7cf45202@snowmobile> References: <20100109004201.77cdaa5a@gentoo.org> <20100109000834.6f6ed79a@snowmobile> <19272.15307.279638.864461@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20100109085821.7cf45202@snowmobile> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/tNt==jdDjdd+uP=oUvujfol"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 33ff6661-58cf-4eff-9fe1-e0cc72183022 X-Archives-Hash: 7785adc8aa9d5f15adca9d23a961177f --Sig_/tNt==jdDjdd+uP=oUvujfol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ciaran McCreesh : > On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there > > > should be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? > >=20 > > Yes, but any =3Dbash-3.2* is still allowed: > >=20 > > | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with > > | =3Dbash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. >=20 > Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single > 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable > with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least > one version of bash-3.2_psomething". So one has to work around obvious bugs to satisfy p0? p9999 will support everything p0 has while eliminating bugs that cripple official features advertised for p0. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/tNt==jdDjdd+uP=oUvujfol Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktImgcACgkQNQqtfCuFneNJfwCePaXT5UueMRpJ0GhAnF3BUUMN kE0An059E/yl0oQLcp42ZWKaxtrNwQ5H =Po39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tNt==jdDjdd+uP=oUvujfol--