From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTYCd-0007xy-Eg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:05:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19D02E08BD for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f215.google.com (mail-ew0-f215.google.com [209.85.219.215]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C89BE0656 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so4682647ewy.30 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:58:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=s3yh3LfmBb9kpdRs/uhc6VOtQFTMrqlTxi1GBM2sIuw=; b=SaeSwG8j6SRPVSnRF5G3L8Imt43WuRuv4ZuSDVm6NHBWNE8tS759s5066D+MrPEWXi Ymv96haL/Xfsg85vBNREFufQKeqOzxkCFYBl52cbdWHy3bhSkDp15Xh/w2fTN4Mb53wy U1QlrCjVxenI/j+67LqhQ7pboW5FYdpIMgpmw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=BZDrR2SS6qDw/URSMdDStOjdf6I0aDyy5+ELEnUuhLZzm/bhcVgMn22cP6gdV7SURo yA/SgNzhudNsBXo2Z7yUUb7e8Z6u4q2Es+g5JvG65qmDA6geIcgQ4Dxtfr0Rbi+75ogq 8/Yr65tvYfmhnQiMsVPWFvaA2cPBmhYPKapCU= Received: by 10.216.90.203 with SMTP id e53mr1203562wef.86.1263027509540; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:58:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (cpc1-sgyl18-0-0-cust846.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm2413634eyf.6.2010.01.09.00.58.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:58:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:58:21 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features Message-ID: <20100109085821.7cf45202@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <19272.15307.279638.864461@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20100109004201.77cdaa5a@gentoo.org> <20100109000834.6f6ed79a@snowmobile> <19272.15307.279638.864461@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/eg5L9OQ63si6Nj3cPvE5RCP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9f0ce33d-8901-406b-abd5-ad933c39482c X-Archives-Hash: 53596affcf1326436b0cf4f96c154ba3 --Sig_/eg5L9OQ63si6Nj3cPvE5RCP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should > > be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? >=20 > Yes, but any =3Dbash-3.2* is still allowed: >=20 > | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with > | =3Dbash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least one version of bash-3.2_psomething". --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/eg5L9OQ63si6Nj3cPvE5RCP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktIRTEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGtTQCgnEkqE47IQ+IY76F2hpRWcq55 mBQAoLETXNqj1bz5wDqtv7jq8X5TK9Yq =8fy7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eg5L9OQ63si6Nj3cPvE5RCP--