From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJA0e-0003KS-PD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:14:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69D49E075F for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com (mail-bw0-f215.google.com [209.85.218.215]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2926FE07B6 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so800857bwz.26 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=m/9adOIdG+mmYnX4T3960unujaMVLLvXVNyyYazMjEg=; b=l+QXK+msKdZ4jb0NnCgbvhKVNlEZSKpxyvApccZ6XaMApQTKmi94Yt6MeSBrQpdajd KVtVIl4DXoxB7yyeR59RBF4lKiyX/5Rlc6OONNSPmotOKbl2uDdC+nX+nC7YHH414cSf kfWcJxzH+mo1PsXDg0ltS83M+xOLcDl5IRT7k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=kGBTC8XDjAb54vFDxARDKjauq0/4Cml8RDunzu+oQqKgF/xAdm2rX8Om8JGEHseAB8 1LvDb79mrDmwieaTQEV9J2w2PPL3d26chCNnmB9CVGVP36ISFrc3AB7EY7KTHkUIdQLd D9CPMAnjdu4O/rUbqC0mZbvARhpdMtwCsm52U= Received: by 10.103.64.21 with SMTP id r21mr361512muk.13.1260551195397; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (cpc1-sgyl18-0-0-cust846.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm5367148muh.32.2009.12.11.09.06.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:06:00 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] kdebuild-1 conditionales Message-ID: <20091211170600.478a41fa@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <19234.24337.19446.706084@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20091210214848.7d070ab2@gentoo.org> <20091210222730.5df0df14@snowmobile> <19233.57824.170546.83662@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211135605.2b0d1d61@snowmobile> <19234.24337.19446.706084@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/O35IsXXy5AHXIrB7WqFwxW_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4a6d4607-3b52-4353-a6ee-3067b039eb59 X-Archives-Hash: 229d4b64763172e8d0bf20d409335485 --Sig_/O35IsXXy5AHXIrB7WqFwxW_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:02:41 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > We also don't know when we'll have a spec of what EAPI 3 is, so > > there's no point in tinkering with PMS until we do. >=20 > Come on. Renaming from 3 to 4 is trivial. But dumping in a bunch of "we don't know" sections into the main branch for 3 is completely against existing practice. We very deliberately didn't do that for works in progress for previous EAPIs. Why change now? > >> > We also don't have approved summaries of any of the meetings > >> > where these things happened. > >>=20 > >> And what is [1] then? >=20 > > Something that wasn't there when I sent the original email, as you > > know very well. >=20 > It was on the council page when I read your mail. And is this in any > way relevant? We have a summary now. Because your sarcastic reply suggests some kind of inaccuracy on my part, whereas in fact you're trying to pull a fast one. A correct and appropriate response would be "This has now been fixed [1]". For someone who complains about a lack of goodwill when people point out problems with your patches, you're certainly not going out of the way to set a better example. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/O35IsXXy5AHXIrB7WqFwxW_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksie/gACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGqygCgpTozIYxkk2prQQO7ldBUK74L lBQAn2LgLeMCSkJFGNpqWgVtni7EiAwE =3SD9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/O35IsXXy5AHXIrB7WqFwxW_--