From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmYVV-0000RD-0q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:43:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33305E06FE; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAA0E06FE for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOjw+sRFVcEIEI7w= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p57A4E30E.dip.t-dialin.net [87.164.227.14]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo17) (RZmta 21.0) with ESMTP id w05162l8CJDonn ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:43:30 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:43:25 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Cc: betelgeuse@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarification of has_version cat/pkg[use=] behavior for EAPI 3 or 4 Message-ID: <20090912214325.223e0112@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AABDD67.606@gentoo.org> References: <4AABDD67.606@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/pr1VtZQte3dBycyi1iNeS5G"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 55b9707b-0bb0-4038-ba39-328769435cd4 X-Archives-Hash: f6a628dea30e3fabd777a08e426b2902 --Sig_/pr1VtZQte3dBycyi1iNeS5G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Petteri R=C3=A4ty : > I see a couple course of possible actions: > 1. Current PMS already implies this behavior and Portage is buggy. > Let's document this explicitly for EAPI 3 and have Portage fixed so > using EAPI 3 makes sure this syntax works. Looks like the best practise to me. It is a corner case, but better be safe. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/pr1VtZQte3dBycyi1iNeS5G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqr+eEACgkQNQqtfCuFneO5HwCgmqNxM6kM28IORkwHDwcfCyli ev0AoJStRhcjUfmfhklDsh6IwCHfreiH =EVp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pr1VtZQte3dBycyi1iNeS5G--