From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKylt-0006Wp-Kn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:38:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9B2CE09A2; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F88EE09A2 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nBGIckap001794; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:38:46 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nBGIckBB019790; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:38:46 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBGIck7t019787; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:38:46 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19241.10550.738675.206665@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:38:46 +0100 To: Ciaran McCreesh Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: kdebuild-1 conditionals In-Reply-To: <20091216182506.04146117@snowcone> References: <20091210215156.7b7f4c99@gentoo.org> <19234.27207.29657.928156@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211170806.37ca2fcc@snowmobile> <19241.9507.687117.199660@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091216182506.04146117@snowcone> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12 under 23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 75b96450-29ec-4f3b-9c77-62338e30b6fa X-Archives-Hash: 6ee088bbad7d2aa64a385bdf0520884c >>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > It'll break the mtime and prefix patches that're pending review, > and I'm still waiting for Christian to revert his mistakes. Only possible mistake that I see is the note in the cheat sheet. If the EAPI renaming was reverted then above-mentioned patches would break, too. Ulrich