From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJA0t-0003Mz-TI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:14:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A76FE0684 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD28E0757 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nBBHQpBW004679; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:26:51 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nBBHQoPm012505; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:26:50 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBBHQoWc012502; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:26:50 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19234.32986.934402.825749@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:26:50 +0100 To: Ciaran McCreesh Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] kdebuild-1 conditionales In-Reply-To: <20091211170600.478a41fa@snowmobile> References: <20091210214848.7d070ab2@gentoo.org> <20091210222730.5df0df14@snowmobile> <19233.57824.170546.83662@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211135605.2b0d1d61@snowmobile> <19234.24337.19446.706084@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211170600.478a41fa@snowmobile> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12 under 23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 7050c2ce-7822-4cc5-9528-0eab0fc84f57 X-Archives-Hash: 482c1cbeb426fe8c698122160ae3d7ce >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> It was on the council page when I read your mail. And is this in >> any way relevant? We have a summary now. > Because your sarcastic reply suggests some kind of inaccuracy on my > part, Yes, sorry, I didn't double check the commit time of the summary when I found that it's on the council's page. Also leio had sent the final version to the council ml two days before. > whereas in fact you're trying to pull a fast one. Not true. > A correct and appropriate response would be "This has now been fixed > [1]". Right. This has now been fixed. So can we end this useless discussion now? Ulrich