* [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
@ 2012-05-06 17:15 Ciaran McCreesh
2012-05-06 18:33 ` Tiziano Müller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2012-05-06 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-pms
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 229 bytes --]
Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5, to go with apply_user_patches?
If we don't, users will have to either work out the patch command
themselves, or hope that ebuilds they want to patch inherit eutils.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
2012-05-06 17:15 [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? Ciaran McCreesh
@ 2012-05-06 18:33 ` Tiziano Müller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tiziano Müller @ 2012-05-06 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-pms
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 298 bytes --]
+1 from me.
Am Sonntag, den 06.05.2012, 18:15 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5, to go with apply_user_patches?
> If we don't, users will have to either work out the patch command
> themselves, or hope that ebuilds they want to patch inherit eutils.
>
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3551 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-06 18:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-06 17:15 [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? Ciaran McCreesh
2012-05-06 18:33 ` Tiziano Müller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox