public inbox for gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
@ 2012-05-06 17:15 Ciaran McCreesh
  2012-05-06 18:33 ` Tiziano Müller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2012-05-06 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-pms

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 229 bytes --]

Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5, to go with apply_user_patches?
If we don't, users will have to either work out the patch command
themselves, or hope that ebuilds they want to patch inherit eutils. 

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5?
  2012-05-06 17:15 [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? Ciaran McCreesh
@ 2012-05-06 18:33 ` Tiziano Müller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tiziano Müller @ 2012-05-06 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-pms

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 298 bytes --]

+1 from me.

Am Sonntag, den 06.05.2012, 18:15 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5, to go with apply_user_patches?
> If we don't, users will have to either work out the patch command
> themselves, or hope that ebuilds they want to patch inherit eutils. 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3551 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-06 18:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-06 17:15 [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? Ciaran McCreesh
2012-05-06 18:33 ` Tiziano Müller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox