From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RcReD-0008Eo-FP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:04:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2F3D21C1A0; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C96321C1A0 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.43] (pool-173-66-233-165.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.66.233.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C40981B4001 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1324256633.12311.53.camel@rook> Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF From: Alexandre Rostovtsev To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:03:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20206.32890.171045.50686@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20206.32890.171045.50686@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Package Manager Specification discussions X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 2fbb8d22-c5b0-4960-bc72-93ba48435fba X-Archives-Hash: 2627f65500d51508ab28789ad463619f On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 01:08 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > [Why are there different Reply-To: headers in -dev and in -pms MLs? > Following up to both lists.] I apologize for the mess; I had intended to bring the question up before a wider audience, but failed to think through the consequences of two mailing lists ending up in the reply-to. For the sake of keeping discussion in one thread, I ask that further replies should be made to gentoo-dev, not gentoo-pms. -Alexandre