From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-perl+bounces-462-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GoMkt-00074o-EL
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:21:23 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAQGL0kI017908;
Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:21:00 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAQGKxFk022870
for <gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:20:59 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F9C64416
for <gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:06:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.17 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.352, BAYES_00=-2.599,
TW_GT=0.077]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id yv60Aev+jnbI for <gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:06:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1294B64731
for <gentoo-perl@gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:06:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p77so2058475nfc
for <gentoo-perl@gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:05:16 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=VWiJ/1GGD8Cu/G/CGrJCZXB1r+l10zttVEX/2gCOs5O0ethrz4fZNXRqdt7FaBbHgsNyhRQsgzLNp30P3EXigfWC6MRpeWIS1OqQ2sKnnCWGzQFiqCkufztTs9d/y/4D65eNRzi1z2AaWa/JlHBTnNRSTzFlhdAKdFYlAP/ownE=
Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr1833955bud.1164557115957;
Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.112.12 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4a10e1350611260805o7ab1d4c9q6cd9f02efaecbfdc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:05:15 -0800
From: "Aaron Kulbe" <akulbe@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-perl] gnome-1 && gtk-perl
In-Reply-To: <200611260831.53024.mcummings@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-perl+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-perl+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-perl+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-perl.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200611200800.19683.mcummings@gentoo.org>
<200611260831.53024.mcummings@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 9b4e12e3-7e3a-4355-9733-392450eec71a
X-Archives-Hash: 2e6ee11c07e6ad76b75856bd7bb5cfdd
On 11/26/06, Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org> wrote:
> OK...not even a whisper, so I'm guessing I was the only perl person that liked
> having the gtk-perl bindings around. I'll go forward with the maskings :/
I'll whisper. :) No X on my machine, and I was always a QT fan, anyways. :)
> On Monday 20 November 2006 08:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > As most of you are probably aware, the gnome team has decided to remove
> > gnome-1 from the tree because it is a drain on their resources to support
> > (my wording for it). While I can sympathize and understand the argument, we
> > (perl) have more than a few modules/apps that rely on this gnome-1 support
> > to function. A few Gentoo developers, such as spyderous, have offered to
> > continue to support gnome-1 to help keep their apps alive, and have asked
> > if we would like to be a part of that. Rather than arbitrarily say yes all
> > on my lonesome (since we all know my hard core c/c++ skills are lacking),
> > I'd like to ask your opinions. Just to give a brief sample, we're talking
> > about packages like gtk-perl, glade-perl (which would be moved under
> > gtk-perl per a pending bug, but I didn't see the point in pursuing that
> > while gtk-perl was package.masked), bins, and the associated modules.
> >
> > --
> >
> > -----o()o----------------------------------------------
> > Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
> > Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
> > Gentoo/SPARC
> > Gentoo/AMD64
> > GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
> > -----o()o----------------------------------------------
>
> --
>
> -----o()o----------------------------------------------
> Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
> Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
> Gentoo/SPARC
> Gentoo/AMD64
> GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
> -----o()o----------------------------------------------
>
> Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.
>
>
>
--
gentoo-perl@gentoo.org mailing list