From: "Aaron Kulbe" <akulbe@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-perl] gnome-1 && gtk-perl
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:05:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a10e1350611260805o7ab1d4c9q6cd9f02efaecbfdc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611260831.53024.mcummings@gentoo.org>
On 11/26/06, Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org> wrote:
> OK...not even a whisper, so I'm guessing I was the only perl person that liked
> having the gtk-perl bindings around. I'll go forward with the maskings :/
I'll whisper. :) No X on my machine, and I was always a QT fan, anyways. :)
> On Monday 20 November 2006 08:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > As most of you are probably aware, the gnome team has decided to remove
> > gnome-1 from the tree because it is a drain on their resources to support
> > (my wording for it). While I can sympathize and understand the argument, we
> > (perl) have more than a few modules/apps that rely on this gnome-1 support
> > to function. A few Gentoo developers, such as spyderous, have offered to
> > continue to support gnome-1 to help keep their apps alive, and have asked
> > if we would like to be a part of that. Rather than arbitrarily say yes all
> > on my lonesome (since we all know my hard core c/c++ skills are lacking),
> > I'd like to ask your opinions. Just to give a brief sample, we're talking
> > about packages like gtk-perl, glade-perl (which would be moved under
> > gtk-perl per a pending bug, but I didn't see the point in pursuing that
> > while gtk-perl was package.masked), bins, and the associated modules.
> >
> > --
> >
> > -----o()o----------------------------------------------
> > Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
> > Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
> > Gentoo/SPARC
> > Gentoo/AMD64
> > GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
> > -----o()o----------------------------------------------
>
> --
>
> -----o()o----------------------------------------------
> Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
> Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
> Gentoo/SPARC
> Gentoo/AMD64
> GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
> -----o()o----------------------------------------------
>
> Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.
>
>
>
--
gentoo-perl@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-26 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-20 13:00 [gentoo-perl] gnome-1 && gtk-perl Michael Cummings
2006-11-26 13:31 ` Michael Cummings
2006-11-26 16:05 ` Aaron Kulbe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a10e1350611260805o7ab1d4c9q6cd9f02efaecbfdc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akulbe@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-perl@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox